Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Mike Tyson Sued For $25 Million By Paparazzi Photographer: Report


A paparazzi photographer filed a $25 million lawsuit against Mike Tyson on Monday, claiming that the former heavy weight champion attacked him in 2009, according to RadarOnline.
According to the lawsuit, Tyson attacked photographer Antonio Echevarria at LAX airport on Nov. 11, 2009. Echevarria reportedly claimed that Tyson said, "I will kill you."
Echevarria reportedly said Tyson and two employees at the airport made false statements to the police, resulting in him being taken into custody too.
On the day of the alleged fight, Tyson was said to have been taken to the Los Angeles Police Department's 77th Station for misdemeanor battery, while Echevarria was taken to a local hospital due to a "minor laceration to his forehead."
Tyson's attorney Shawn Chapman Holley reportedly made a statement saying Echevarria "aggressively pursued" the ex-boxer and bumped the stroller of his baby.

Ava Sambora, 13, Looks Just Like Mom Heather Locklear (PHOTOS)

Heather Locklear and her daughter Ava (dad is Locklear's ex-husband Richie Sambora) were a pretty pair at a fashion show for White Trash Beautiful, Sambora's line, in LA Sunday night.
Ava, 13, is already starting a career as a model and walked the runway at the show.




Kristen Stewart: I Was Offered Job At A Strip Club

MTV:
Kristen Stewart plays a teen runaway-turned-stripper in her new flick "Welcome to the Rileys." And while fans will have to head to the theater on November 5 (or October 29 if you're in a city where it opens early in limited release) to find out whether James Gandolfini (Doug Riley) welcomes her to his dysfunctional family, Stewart, who sat down with MTV News on Monday, revealed some interesting details about filming the Jake Scott-directed flick.
Has Stewart ever felt comfortable enough to flaunt her sexuality the way her character, Mallory, does in the film? Well, if one job offer she got while in New Orleans filming the movie proves anything, it's that maybe she's got it and doesn't even have to flaunt it.

Taylor Swift Writes Song About John Mayer Heartbreak?


popeater.com:
Taylor Swift's latest album is an open book about her love life. First she penned a song about 'Twilight' hunk Taylor Lautner. Now she's reportedly taking aim at John Mayer, which confirms rumors that the two were romantically involved in 2009 while collaborating on 'Half of My Heart,' a track from his last album. Based on lyrics from Swift's new song 'Dear John,' off her upcoming album 'Speak Now,' the ladies' man broke her heart.

Kanye West: I've Considered Suicide


Kanye West Suicide
LOS ANGELES — Kanye West told an audience at a screening of his film, "Runaway," that he thought about killing himself, but now feels a responsibility to make a meaningful contribution to pop culture and art.
Describing himself as a pop icon and "soldier for culture," West told the crowd "there were times that I contemplated suicide." However, he said, "I will not give up on life again."
"There's so many people that will never get the chance to have their voice heard" as loudly as his, West said Monday. "I do it for them."
West, who didn't say when he had considered suicide, is credited as director of the abstract 35-minute film, which features portions of nine new West songs, boldly colorful visuals and off-kilter camera angles. The mostly dialogue-free piece, set to premiere this weekend on MTV, VH1 and BET, will accompany West's upcoming album, "My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy," which will be released Nov. 22.
After a prelude featuring narration from rapper Nicki Minaj, West's character, Griffin, is seen driving a black MTX Tatra supercar down a country road. Lying next to a hole in the pavement is a phoenix fallen to Earth, played by model Selita Ebanks in pink, gray and brown feathers.
He takes her home and offers this advice: "First rule in this world, baby: Don't pay attention to anything you see on the news."
The phoenix sits on a lawn with a deer, rabbit and sheep, then joins West at a private parade featuring fireworks, a marching band and a float depicting Michael Jackson.
Playing over those visuals are West's next single, "All of the Lights," which he said features Elton John on piano and an all-star chorus including Alicia Keys, Rihanna, Fergie and John Legend.
Ballerinas in black tutus perform in a scene featuring his current single, "Runaway." When the tune ended, there was applause from both the on-screen and live audience. In attendance were Morgan Spurlock, Ryan Phillippe, Pete Wentz and others in the entertainment industry.

NFL To Begin Suspending Players For Dangerous Hits

NEW YORK — The NFL will immediately begin suspending players for dangerous and flagrant hits, particularly those involving helmets.
Suspensions also could be handed out for hits during last weekend's games.
The league's announcement comes one day after its vice president of football operations told The Associated Press stiffer penalties could be forthcoming. The NFL said the new disciplinary measures will be in place for this weekend's games.
In the past, players were either fined or ejected for illegal hits. However, after a series of flagrant tackles last Sunday, several of which resulted in concussions, the NFL ratcheted up the punishment.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.
The NFL will immediately begin suspending players for dangerous and flagrant hits, particularly those involving helmets.
The league's announcement comes one day after its vice president of football operations told The Associated Press said such penalties could be forthcoming. The NFL said such discipline will be in place for this weekend's games.
In the past, players were either fined or ejected for illegal hits. But after a series of flagrant tackles last weekend, several of which resulted in concussions, the NFL ratcheted up the punishment.

This Yankees Fan "Sez" Thank You, Freddy Schuman


Posted: October 19, 2010 07:26 AM 
 
In New York City, the global Mecca for business, entertainment, art and fashion, a man became famous -- and beloved -- for banging a frying pan with a spoon. Freddy "Sez" Schuman was a welcome reminder that, at heart, the big city is just a small town. And in the wake of his passing on Sunday at age 85, a community mourns one of its own.
Of course, banging a frying pan with a spoon doesn't really describe Freddy's art. Freddy was, like many New Yorkers, a Yankees fan. It was the way he expressed his fandom that was unique. For more than two decades, Freddy would show up to damn near every Yankees home game, carrying a hand-lettered sign, done in colorful magic marker, a spoon, and a frying pan (yes, in the pre-9/11 days, you could bring a frying pan into Yankee Stadium). The sign was different each game, reflecting the Yanks' current status ("Freddy 'Sez' Confidence Will Make The Slump Go Away!!" "Freddy 'Sez' Yankees Are Hot, Like A Blast Furnace!"). On the frying pan was drawn a lucky four-leaf clover.
For more than twenty seasons, Freddy "Sez," always dressed in a Yankees jacket and baseball cap, would wander the aisles and corridors of Yankee Stadium, inviting anyone and everyone to bang on the frying pan with his spoon and bring the Yankees luck. And if the last 16 years or so are any indication, it worked.
"Clank! Clank! Clank-clank-clank!" The sound of spoon striking pan, several dozen times a game at minimum, became one of the old familiar sounds of the Stadium, along with the Bleacher Creatures chanting roll call at the beginning of each game ("A-Rod!" [clap-clap] A-Rod!" [clap-clap]) or Bob Sheppard, first live and then on tape, announcing "Numbah Two, Derek Jee-tuh" at bat. It became a rite of passage for Yankee fans to bang the pan and pay their respects to Freddy.
I'd waited years to bump into Freddy, and I finally got my shot during an otherwise unmemorable game about three or four years ago. I was on my way to get a hot dog when I turned a corner and there he was. The first thing I noticed was that he was pretty well blind -- I believe he only had one working eye to begin with, and it didn't work very well. I was amazed that he was able to get around the vertigo-inducing upper reaches of the old Stadium without taking a tumble or two.
Our meeting was not one for the ages. It went something like this:
Me: Freddy, it's a pleasure to finally meet you. I've been waiting years for this.
Freddy: Well, thank you. It's nice to meet you too.
Me: Can I... bang the pan?
Freddy: Of course, go ahead.
[Clank! Clank! Clank-clank-clank!]
Me: Wow, that was so cool! Thanks a lot.
Freddy: Here, take a newsletter.
Freddy published (well, Xeroxed and handed out) a newsletter several times a year, containing paeans to the Yankees, poems, philosophy, and even, if I remember correctly, a recipe or two. I still have a couple of them somewhere.
Freddy lived in my neighborhood on the Upper West Side, so every now and then I'd see him as a "civilian" during the off-season. It was always a little weird to see him without the sign and frying pan, but I suppose it would have been more disturbing if he carried them with him when he wasn't on his way to or from the Stadium.
He seemed pretty ancient even when he first attained a measure of celebrity in the early 1990s, and he never looked particularly healthy, but his loss still came as a shock. To die during the playoffs, with the Yankees about to face Texas ace Cliff Lee, no less? It's such an un-Freddy-like thing to do.
The Yankees may be the corporate colossus that bestrides the baseball world, but they're also still the hometown team. And before Game 3 of the ALCS, the organization had a moment of silence for Freddy "Sez" Schuman. His jacket, cap and frying pan lay in repose, as it were, inside Gate 4 of Yankee Stadium. It was a beautiful tribute. But I wish they could have scrounged up 50,000 four leaf clover-festooned frying pans on short notice instead. The din would have been loud enough for Freddy to hear, in the stadium in the sky where he was doubtlessly checking out the action.
Clank! Clank! Clank-clank-clank!
 

Friday, October 15, 2010

Bringing Down the Bookie: Week 6

Came back to earth last week going 1-4 bringing my record to 14-9-2, while the good Doctor went 4-1 bringing his record to 14-11.
Dr. Bob is actually offering up some of his best bets on HuffPost but to see the rest of his best bets go to www.drbobsports.com.
On to this week's picks. From Dr. Bob...
MICHIGAN STATE (-7) 33 Illinois 19
Both of these teams are coming off upset wins, as Michigan State beat rival Michigan 34-17 and Illinois won at Penn State 33-13. While you'd expect both teams that be in equal letdown modes, but that is not actually the case. It's the Illini that apply to a very negative 9-52 ATS road underdog letdown situation and Michigan State is also the clearly superior team. Illinois' freshman quarterback Nathan Scheelhaase has been inconsistent with 2 good games (Southern Illinois and last week against Penn State) and 3 bad games and he's been below average overall, averaging 5.7 yards per pass play against teams that would allow 6.0 yppp to an average quarterback. Michigan State defends the pass well (5.6 yppp allowed to quarterbacks that would average 6.2 yppp against an average team), so I expect Scheelhaase to struggle this week. Illinois does have a good rushing attack, averaging 5.3 yards per rushing play against teams that would allow 4.7 yprp to an average team, but Michigan State is slightly better than that defending the run (4.1 yprp allowed to teams that would average 4.8 yprp). My math model projects just 4.8 yppl for the Illini in this game without taking into account the letdown situation.
California (+2 ½) 30 USC 24
California's 31-52 loss at Nevada on national TV has the Bears underrated, as that game is not representative of how good Jeff Tedford's team is. Cal played that game without their 1st Team All-Pac 10 LB Mike Mohamed and the Bears' attack style of defense isn't suited to defend an option team like Nevada that can also throw the ball effectively. The combination of Mohamed being out and being forced to play a read and react style of defense resulted in the Wolf Pack averaging 8.2 yppl in that game (Nevada would average 7.2 yppl at home against an average defensive team). However, the Bears have been dominating defensively otherwise, holding Colorado, Arizona and UCLA to a combined average of just 232 yards at 3.4 yppl and 8.0 points per game. Most impressive was limiting Arizona's potent attack to just 4.9 yppl and 10 points, as the Wildcats would average 7.3 yppl at home against an average team. Overall, the Bears' defense ranks among the best in the nation even with that bad Nevada game included, as they've yielded just 4.5 yppl to teams that would combine to average 6.0 yppl against an average stop unit. USC will be another stiff challenge, as USC has averaged 7.3 yppl against teams that would allow 5.7 yppl to an average team. USC's offense rates at just 0.1 yppl better than Cal's defense, but Cal may be better than their overall stats given the one outlier against Nevada when their best player didn't play. Cal was able to shut down Arizona and I rate the Wildcats' offense as better than that of USC, so I think the Bears are certainly capable of limiting the Trojans today.
Iowa State (+23 ½) 26 OKLAHOMA 38
Oklahoma may be undefeated and ranked 6th in the nation but the Sooners simply aren't a dominant team this season. Oklahoma has only played one really impressive game, their 47-17 win over Florida State, and they've escaped with close wins against Utah State (31-24), Air Force (27-24), Cincinnati (31-29) and against an overrated Texas team (28-20) in a game in which they were out-played 4.3 yards per play to 5.9 yppl and won because of a +2 turnover margin. For the season the Sooners are averaging just 5.1 yards per play against teams that would allow 5.1 yppl to an average team and their defense is actually worse than average in allowing 5.9 yppl to teams that would combine to average 5.5 yppl against an average team. Despite worse than average yppl stats, the Sooners are actually a better than average team because they average 83 plays per game while allowing 70 plays and they have good special teams, but they are certainly not a top-10 team and I wouldn't even rank them in my top-20. Iowa State just lost 27-68 at home to a very good Utah team, but the Cyclones beat up on Texas Tech 52-38 the week before that and they are certainly not bad enough to merit a line above 21 points. In fact, Iowa State's decent offensive attack (5.2 yppl against teams that would allow 5.3 yppl to an average team) should move the ball pretty well against Oklahoma's sub-par defense and the Cyclones haven't been too bad on defense this season, allowing 6.1 yppl to teams that would combine to average 5.8 yppl against an average defensive team. That's actually just 0.3 yppl worse than Oklahoma's mediocre offensive rating. Iowa State will likely be without RB Alexander Robinson this week, but Robinson's 5.1 ypr on 88 carries looks like it can be adequately replaced by Shontrelle Johnson and Jeff Woody, who combine to average 5.9 ypr on their 55 runs this season (5.3 ypr if I take out their yards against Utah's second string defense last week, which of course I do). My math model projects Oklahoma with 15 more plays than Iowa State and a 548 yards at 6.3 yppl to 391 yards at 5.5 yppl advantage, but that's not enough to justify such a high line even after accounting for Oklahoma's advantage in projected turnovers and a slight edge in special teams. In fact, my math favors Oklahoma by just 17 ½ points in this game and Iowa State's blowout loss last week sets the Cyclones up in a very good 24-0 ATS subset of a 75-16 ATS bounce-back situation that plays on big road dogs after getting embarrassed in their previous game.

Oklahoma State (+3) 38 TEXAS TECH 31
Texas Tech beat me last week in their 45-38 win over Baylor, but that win did nothing to change my mind about the Red Raiders being an average team (they were out-gained 6.7 yards per play to 6.9 yppl by Baylor). For the season Texas Tech has averaged 443 yards at 5.7 yppl (against teams that would allow 5.5 yppl to an average team) while allowing 410 yards at 5.5 yppl (to teams that would average just 5.2 yppl against an average defense). The Red Raiders are actually worse than average from the line of scrimmage after compensating for their easier than normal schedule and Tech is also below average in special teams. From a scoring perspective, Texas Tech has out-scored their opponents by 5.2 points per game (36.8 to 31.6) and they've played a schedule that is 3.4 points easier than average. That would make the Red Raiders 1.8 points better than average looking strictly at points.
TROY STATE (-19) 42 UL Lafayette 14
Troy is the class of the Sun Belt again this season and the Trojans should continue to dominate weaker league foes at home. Troy is 10-2 ATS as a conference home favorite of 11 points or more since 2004, including 3-0 ATS last season and the Trojans should have their way with a horrible UL Lafayette squad after beating up on an overrated Middle Tennessee team last week 42-13. That win sets up the Trojans in a very good 71-22 ATS home favorite momentum situation and my math model likes Troy as well. Troy State's offense is averaging 489 yards at 6.1 yards per play and 36 points per game (against teams that would allow 5.8 yppl to an average team) and the Trojans are likely to gain even more yardage than normal against a soft Ragin' Cajuns' defense that has given up 6.0 yppl and 39 points per game to teams that would combine to average just 5.3 yppl. Lafayette is also hurting on that side of the ball with 3 defensive starters out with injury after FS Rolle, DE Richardson and LB Fleming were all hurt last week against Oklahoma State. I didn't even adjust for those injuries and my math model still projects 507 yards at 6.8 yppl and 42 points for the Trojans in this game.
And on to my picks...
St. Louis +8 versus San Diego
SD has been a solid team this year even though their record does not seem to agree. This is simply too many points for a St. Louis team that can play well at home.
KC +4 versus Houston
KC actually showed me more in their loss last week than they did in their previous three wins. Houston offensive line played like a turnstyle at New York and KC will get pressure on Schaub. KC will be able to score against a weak Houston defense making the points to juicy to pass up.
NO -4 @ TB
If this game had been played in week 1, the line would have been 6 or 7. Is TB legit? Is NO terrible? I think this is an overreaction to what's happened in the last few weeks. I think NO gets their act together and wins this game comfortably.
Washington +3 over Indy
Washington is a solid team and getting three points at home shows no respect for what they have accomplished so far. Indy D has holes against the run and Washington will do their best to make Indy one dimensional.
SF -6.5 versus Oakland
Everyone is waiting for this Niner's team to finally show their true skills and hopefully this is the week. The Niners have a good defense and if Alex Smith can avoid the turnovers this is a game they should win by more than a TD.

How to Earn $900,000 an Hour While Unemployment Soars

Let's be honest. Wouldn't you like to rake in a cool $900,000 for one hour's work? No? Still have hippie ideals, perhaps? You could work for just 10 minutes and walk off with $150,000. Push yourself to work one entire day and we're talking $7.2 million. Hang in there for a month, and you'll pull in more than the richest athletes make in 10 years -- $256.5 million. And in one year? Well, you'll be earning what the top ten hedge fund honchos each averaged in 2009 -- $1.87 billion. Wouldn't you like to know their secrets? Here are a few:
Step 1: Check your conscience at the door.
You must be able to live with the knowledge that while you were making $900,000 an hour, more than 29 million other Americans had no job at all or were forced into part-time work. Also you'd have to live with the uncomfortable fact that your sector -- high finance -- crashed the economy, leaving eight million Americans jobless in a matter of months.
You're obviously good at math so you'll be able to calculate that it will now take 22.5 million new jobs to bring the economy back to full-employment (an unemployment rate of 5 percent or less). That's the equivalent of creating 630 new corporations the size of Apple Corp. (35,000 employees each). Sadly, you're also a realist, so you know that unemployment is likely to remain at record post-WWII highs for years to come.
Feeling guilty? Don't. Remind everyone again and again that hedge funds like yours didn't get bailed out. You're not too big to fail. You just figured out how to be better at investing than anyone else. You're what capitalism is supposed to reward. You earned your $900,000 an hour fair and square! Suppress all your doubts and just keep telling yourself -- and everyone else -- that you have nothing to do with rising poverty or the fact that nearly 50 million people can't afford health care. You're the solution, not the problem. Conscience be damned!
Step 2: Remember: None of this is your fault!
Yes, a few tiresome critics will keep pointing the finger at you, saying that the financial sector crashed the economy. Ignore them and put the blame where it belongs - somewhere else. When in doubt, seek guidance from the pros on Wall Street. They know exactly who to blame:
  • The few bad apples who gave out mortgages like candy
  • The greedy Americans who bought homes they couldn't afford (they should have ignored the bankers who told them they could!)
  • The politicians who pushed for risky loans for "low-income" buyers (subtext: favoritism for minorities.)
  • The Fed, which kept interest rates too low for too long, inflating the bubble
  • And, most importantly, American consumers who "lived beyond their means," running up too much debt. (Those people, not you, really need to tighten their belts!)

Assert with the utmost confidence that it's Wall Street billionaires who make our system the envy of the world, so help me god.
Step 3: Proclaim that you are the solution:
It's not enough to dodge the blame. You've got to convince academics and journalists to anoint you as the savior. You see, it's you and your fellow high finance moguls who will save us from ever having to endure a crisis like this again. Fortunately for you, they've already bought the story. For example, in More Money than God, Sebastian Mallaby writes:
How can governments promote small-enough-to fail institutions that manage risk well? This is the key question about the future of finance; and one part of the answer is hiding in plain sight. Governments must encourage hedge funds....The chief policy prescription can be boiled down to two words: Don't regulate." (p 380-81)
Imagine that! Top hedge fund managers who earn $900,000 an hour are the answer to too-big-to-fail bailouts, and you don't even need government regulations to keep them honest! People who suggest that Wall Street billionaires are essentially card counters in a Las Vegas casino? They're just envious. People who question whether the entire casino has any redeeming social or economic value at all? They're just stupid. (For my envious and stupid account, see The Looting of America.)
Step 4: Tell people, "Sure, go ahead and raise taxes on the super-rich!" (wink, wink): Because of Wall Street billionaires our income distribution is the most extreme since 1929. By some estimates it's even worse, with the top 1 percent hoarding nearly 50 percent of our nation's wealth. And yet, a recent academic survey suggests that most Americans have no idea things are so skewed. The vast majority actually said they would prefer a wealth distribution more like Sweden's. Heaven forbid!
So -- why on earth would someone like Warren Buffett be offering to pay more taxes? Well, for one thing, there are worse things than higher income tax rates. What you want to avoid at all cost is any reform that might reduce financial industry profits -- like controls on derivatives and financial transaction fees.
As for raising taxes: Just because you say you're willing to pay them doesn't mean you'll actually ever have to. Everyone knows that the moment anyone actually tries to tax the super-rich, a Greek chorus of greed will chant: "Investor confidence will crash! Small businesses will suffer! Jobs will crumble! The recovery will stall!"
So, once you get to be a billionaire, join the cavalcade of gurus who insist they should at least pay the same tax rates as their secretaries. And if those weak-kneed politicians simply refuse to raise your taxes, well, what's a billionaire to do?
Step 5: Count on America's admiration:
Americans may say they want wealth to be distributed much more evenly. But they also have a perpetual love affair with the super-rich. Any effort to rein in billionaires grates against one of our most fundamental values: the right to make as much money as we can, however we can, whenever we can. The very existence of Wall Street billionaires opens up the possibility that we ourselves will become super rich someday.
Fortunately for Wall Street billionaires, Americans tend to view even modest proposals to redistribute wealth as cataclysmic. (Remember Joe the Plumber?) When I propose that maybe we would be better off without Wall Street billionaires, even non-plumbers tell me: "Oh, no. We don't want to live in a socialist society where incomes are flat. Everyone would lose their motivation. And we'd be stuck with only one flavor of ice cream at our dilapidated collectivist food co-op!" In our political culture, there seem to be no mental resting points between North Korean communism and an economy that lets Wall Street billionaires run wild.
However, every once in a while we get pissed off. In 1913 we passed a constitutional amendment to legalize income taxes on plutocrats. From the 1930s to the 1970s we enacted tax rates on the super-rich that hovered between 70 and 90 percent. And long before that Andrew Jackson vetoed the National Bank because, as he said, "the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes." The rigged Bank laws, he argued, "make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of society the farmers, mechanics, and laborers, who have neither the time nor the means of securing like favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their Government. ()
We're still complaining. We get upset at government because it seems to favor the super-rich. Yet in the end we protect our Wall Street billionaires by attacking regulations and taxes on the wealthy.
Step 6: Thank the lord for sex, drugs and rock'n roll: Reagan and company may have hated the 1960s youth rebellion, but they sure glommed on to a key feature of it: People wanted to be liberated from society's constraints and from a government that was betraying our nation's ideals. Through either insight or dumb luck, the Reagan revolution successfully melded the idea of accumulating wealth with the idea of gaining freedom from everyone and everything -- the ultimate form of "doing your own thing." (My surfer friend called it "takeoff velocity.")
Few of us who came out of the 1960s trusted government. After all, it had waged an unjust and un-winnable war in Vietnam. Public figures seemed to lie to us on a regular basis -- from Mai Lai to Watergate. You want that kind of government running the economy too?
"Do your own thing" economics also caught on. Free love and free markets may have had a lot in common. Milton Friedman (who also opposed criminalization of drugs) led the way among American economists, arguing that government interference always distorts free markets. Only when markets are left entirely alone can they operate efficiently and create prosperity for all. Friedman's free market philosophy won over the academic and policy establishment. They saw the rise of Wall Street billionaires as a sign of our nation's economic health and prosperity. It wasn't just that their vast wealth might trickle down to the rest of us. It was that the accumulation of such wealth in the first place signaled a strong underlying economy.
According to the free market economists, under our system you can't possibly earn $900,000 an hour unless you produce $900,000 worth of something. So financial industry billionaires must, by definition, have the knowledge, skills, and experience to create that enormous value. Because nobody would cough up that sum of money unless they got equivalent value in return.
Therein may lie the biggest secret of all: Wall Street moguls are confident that Americans will always believe that that the big boys are really worth their money.
But for how long? Will our millions of unemployed workers eventually get fed up? Will the middle class finally get angry at the plutocrats who stole their dreams? Or will our anger continue to focus on government regulations, social spending and taxes instead of on our financial plutocrats? Eventually we'll have to choose or the choice will be made for us: Do we want a $900,000 an hour Valhalla for the few? Or a prosperous America for the rest of us?
Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance destroyed our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009. He is currently working on a new book, How to Earn $900,000 an Hour: The Rise of Wall Street Billionaires and the New Class War, (hopefully to be published in 2011).

Crashing the Tea Party Joyride


The Tea Party has done us all a favor. It has pointed out how absent we've been in building a common narrative about modern American citizenship. Their candidates are fascinating -- like watching campaign season through beer goggles. But every time I hear one of them speak in public, I realize what an advantage the rest of us have -- real stories, real characters, real democracy.
The Tea Party is taking a joyride through the world of American ideals. Along the way, it has grabbed the best revolutionary symbols, the cinematic frustration of the masses, and an irreproachable sounding plan (Fiscal responsibility! Constitutionally limited government! Free markets! Yay!)
But it's all emotions and fantasy. Despite the symbolic appeal, Tea Partiers don't really speak to tradition. They speak to nostalgia. These signals resurrected from the past are not representative. They are kitsch.
Their problem is that they actually prefer Bill O'Reilly to the Bill of Rights. Judging from the demographics, the Tea Party is the last act of the cynical Boomers, hence, a vision of government that doesn't go beyond shouting and a soundtrack. Their story has no characters or plot. It ends with the Winnebago driving off the cliff. How romantic and awesome! And then what?
Its time to take what they have started -- a participatory impetus for change -- re-brand it, and run away with it.
The argument is basic, and drawn in stark relief. Is there an US in the USA? Do we have a common purpose? Will we be able to evolve our collective identity to meet the needs of the modern era?
They have the "what" but we have the "how". Last week, I attended the Reinventing Governance conference in Colorado. Everyone there had an example of citizens taking the initiative, solving problems at the local level.
The Tea Party is the crowning achievement of the conservative rise in American politics. Who needs evidence when you have good optics? The right is not required to meet the challenge that the rest of us face -- that of governing ourselves. They are in eternal opposition, even when in office.
Conservatives have achieved this public relations coup because, on the right, the intellectuals and the propagandists are the same people (Gingrich, Rove). In contrast, those who defend the public sector -- public intellectuals -- have gone missing for years. We do have more civic firepower. Its just that our academics and operatives disdain each other. One group is polishing their footnotes and the other group is dialing for dollars. They rarely meet each other.
Moreover, conservatives prioritize communication as much as subject matter -- the right's mother ship Heritage Foundation spends nearly half its money on marketing. Meanwhile, those who believe in the common good work under a myth of omniscience. We believe that because an idea is right it will be obvious and because it is obvious it will be implemented.
These connections are fallacies. They don't exist. To be influential, ideas need a long-term infrastructure behind them. For example, "Islamophobia" is not an accident, it is an outcome. "Ground Zero Mosque" "Jihad Jane" etc. Conservative operatives have in place a network of relationships and one-liners that can surge to meet the needs of the day's headlines. If it is politically useful for them to marginalize Muslim Americans, they do it.
I worked on Capitol Hill in a progressive office during Republican reign. It was like fighting a well trained army with a pickup team. My side was always in the library and in the streets, but never in the room. This is not the same for conservatives today.
The Obama administration certainly could have communicated more consistently and forcefully over the past two years. But our president lacks the philosophical audience to back him up. Where are the people who can explain governing? Who empathize with institutions? Lots of us do, but we are not intentional about it.
Hope and Change still remain to be translated into a story about the rest of us. The path forward is staring us right in the face. Our greatest strength is our immense ability to connect with others, including those in power. Over the next decade, we will create new norms of democratic participation in which -- by definition -- corporations cannot preempt citizens. DC will be the last stop in this movement for change. You act on behalf of the common good dozens of times a day and don't even think about it.
I would argue that we have not even begun to assess our own power. Speaking as a former Hill staffer, the relationships forged on behalf of ideals are viewed differently than the purchased relationships beholden to private commercial lobbies. As Craig Newmark says, "Trust is the new black". We have that in our corner.
Government is changing rapidly. There are dozens of new transparency requirements and rules for openness. But information without interpreters is just more noise. To be politically useful, it requires a civic filter. Every Member of Congress went to High School. You long-time friends, make an appointment with the local office and ask. What are some basic public interest issues that you vote on? What do you need information about? How can we support you? You will be amazed at how many topics have no constituent input.
This kind of individual initiative -- citizens putting a stake in the ground on behalf of the collective -- is powerful. Telling your leaders what you're doing in your community will provide the characters and plot for our narrative.
The American people long for a novel, not a sitcom. We want a good story about who we are and where we're going in the world. Most of all, we want the happy ending, the one where nobody gets left out. Whoever tells this story best will win.
The Tea Party wants a knife fight and we've been showing up with chop sticks. This has to change.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Joe Manganiello Is Engaged To Audra Marie


Sorry ladies, Joe Manganiello is off the market.

While on vacation in Italy the True Blood heartthrob, 33, popped the question to his girlfriend, actress/model Audra Marie, his rep tells PEOPLE.

Manganiello, who plays werewolf Alcide Herveaux on the HBO drama, and Marie met at a 2009 Super Bowl party, but it was anything but love at first sight.

"She wouldn't go out with me for six months," Manganiello told PEOPLE in September. "We started dating a few months before I got cast [on True Blood]."

RELATED: True Blood's Joe Manganiello Hungry Like a Wolf for His Girlfriend


Manganiello says Marie is "a great dresser. She's gorgeous, and she's tall. And she's sweet ... nice. And she makes crazy English breakfasts."

Marie, meanwhile, says her man’s most appealing qualities are his "sense of humor, his work ethic and how humble he is with everything that has gone on."

The pair have not yet set a wedding date.

Christina Aguilera Files For DIVORCE From Jordan Bratman


LOS ANGELES — Christina Aguilera filed for divorce from her husband of five years on Thursday, two days after announcing the couple had separated.
The "Beautiful" singer cited irreconcilable differences with her husband, music executive Jordan Bratman.
Court documents show the couple has a prenuptial agreement, although Aguilera is seeking a judge's ruling awarding her rights to all her earnings.
Aguilera, 29, is seeking joint custody of the couple's 2-year-old son. She announced on Tuesday that she and Bratman had separated and that the couple's commitment to their son "remains as strong as ever."
She did not issue a statement regarding the divorce filing, and a phone message left for Bratman was not immediately returned.
The pair were married in November 2005 and separated on Sept. 11, the court filing states.
The divorce was first reported by celebrity website TMZ.

Meryl Streep's Daughter Mamie Gummer Steps Out With Her Fiance (PHOTOS)

Mamie Gummer and her actor fiance Ben Walker attended the opening night after party for his play 'Bloody Bloody Jackson' (he stars as Andrew Jackson) in NYC Wednesday night.
Mamie, 27, is the oldest of Meryl Streep's three daughters. She and Ben got engaged a year ago.
PHOTOS:


Alec Baldwin, the Internet, and Me

I don't blog often, but when I do it's usually important. In fact, this is only my second Huffington Post blog. The first one was to raise awareness about cancer research. This one is about Alec Baldwin, who is almost as important as cancer research. Alec is a great actor -- one of the best, a passionate supporter of numerous worthy causes and an all around really nice guy. So I was really surprised to learn there is an Internet rumor floating around accusing Alec Baldwin of being anything but gracious and me, of being anything but grateful.
This brouhaha seems to stem from my appearance on David Letterman this past Monday night where I told a story about Alec. After I won the Emmy award, Alec was kind enough to send a really nice wine and cheese basket, with a card addressing me as a "talented, charming bastard." I understood this to be a joke, and coming from Alec, a compliment. I thought that came across in the Letterman bit.

Clearly, some people didn't get my sincerity. So to clear things up, in the spirit of David Letterman, here are my Top Ten Favorite Alec Baldwin Performances, as a thank you for the basket.
10. Beetlejuice -- One of the best performances from a character in the hereafter.
9. It's Complicated -- Alec, Steve Martin and Meryl Streep-- enough said.
8. The Cooler -- Now Alec's character in this movie is actually a "bastard."
7. The Edge/State and Main/ Glengarry Glen Ross -- No actor is more suited to play David Mamet's characters better than Alec. Mamet revisited: "First prize is an Emmy. Anybody want to see second prize? Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you're fired. (Will miss you, Monk. Just kidding. I really love Tony Shalhoub, please don't start any more rumors, internet media.)
6. The Royal Tennabaums/Madagascar 2/Thomas the Tank Engine -- Next to Morgan Freeman, he's the best voice over guy in Hollywood. Such range...
5. The Departed -- The bit where Alec extols the benefits of The Patriot Act may be worthy of an Oscar.
4. Saturday Night Live --Schweddy Balls says it all.
3. The Hunt For Red October -- "Welcome to the New World, Captain."
2. Path To War -- "50 to 300 is my estimate, and if the bombs miss, it can go as high as 12,000, with fifty percent of these civilians and fifty percent of those killed." Still gives me chills.
1. 30 Rock -- There's a reason Alec has two Emmys and I only have one.
Feel free to debate this list...

Yankees, Rangers payroll disparity largest in playoff history



CWhen the Texas Rangers and New York Yankees do battle in the ALCS, it will mark the greatest disparity in raw dollars between payrolls in the history of playoff baseball, at $152 million. Seriously.
Below, we’ve compared the 2010 payrolls (figures per ESPN.com) of both teams, and presented some fun facts for you to impress your friends. Don’t get enough spreadsheets at work? Of course you don’t.

  • The difference between Alex Rodriguez (Yankees’ highest-paid player) and Michael Young (Rangers’ highest-paid) is Mark Teixeira.
  • Re: The Rangers’ five highest-paid players. Cliff Lee, Cristian Guzman and Jorge Cantu were just picked up this summer via trade. Rich Harden was released four days ago.
  • For the price of Alex Rodriguez, you could sign every Texas Ranger except the six highest paid.
  • The difference between the Yankees payroll and the Rangers payroll is the Cubs payroll. The Cubs have the third-highest payroll in baseball.
  • Kerry Wood is alive.
  • Cliff Lee, C.J. Wilson, Colby Lewis and Tommy Hunter (all of Texas’ playoff starting rotation) combined make less than Mariano Rivera – the Yankees’ closer.
  • Who the f**k is Boone Logan? And how does Neftali Feliz make less than him?
  • Jeff Francoeur earns roughly $2 million per hit. (Not true, but feels that way.)
  • The Yankees won 95 games at $207 million. The Rangers won 90 at $55 mil. The Yankees paid $30.4 million per extra win.
  • The Rangers could triple every current player’s salary, sign Mark Teixeira away from the Yankees, and still have a lower payroll.
Most shocking takeaway from all this: Dallas-Fort Worth is a ‘small market?’ Never knew. Always seemed pretty honkin’ big to me.

Quarterbacks lead offensive renaissance in Big Ten

IOWA CITY, Iowa — The Big Ten has the most sheer depth at quarterback among the nation's top conferences.
It's a big change for the league once known as the ground-and-pound circuit.
Six of the top 16 QBs nationally in pass efficiency rating are in the Big Ten. The SEC ranks second with four and no other league has more than two.
The Big Ten has dual-threat stars such as Michigan's Denard Robinson and Terrelle Pryor at top-ranked Ohio State. More traditional drop-back passers, including Iowa's Ricky Stanzi, Michigan State's Kirk Cousins and Wisconsin's Scott Tolzien, have led their teams to strong starts.
Indiana's Ben Chappell leads the league with nearly 300 passing yards a game.

10 Things We Learned From NFL Week 5

  1. Brett Favre is an offensive player in more ways than one.
  2. In addition to leading the Patriots on the field Tom Brady is now required to approve teammates' hairstyles in order for them to remain on the team.
  3. Terrell Owens and Chad Ochocinco should just arrange for their paychecks to be deposited directly into the NFL's bank account so that they can tweet to their hearts' content.
  4. Kroy Biermann and Ndamukong Suh are in no danger of winning the NFL's Fastest Man competition.
  5. With the problems Beanie Wells and Tim Hightower are having Arizona should consider moving Levi Brown to the backfield.
  6. Mark Colombo needs to figure out a way to celebrate touchdowns without falling down.
  7. At this rate the 49ers will be the best 0-16 team in history.
  8. At this rate the Bills will be the worst 0-16 team in history.
  9. Chargers' punter Mike Scifres did not take his special teams mates out for dinner Sunday night.
  10. If LaDainian Tomlinson were ever to create a workout video, Clinton Portis and Fred Taylor would be first in line to buy it.

Brett Favre's Groin Smash Gets Hilarious 'Simpsons' Mash-Up (VIDEO)Why We Care About Brett and His Little Favre


When the long-awaited confirmation came last week (via Deadspin) that Brett Favre had, indeed, sent pictures of his junk to Jenn Sterger, reaction from the sports world was immediate. Many thought Deadspin shouldn't have dignified Favre's actions or Sterger's claims with space on the site. Others thought it was wrong to put Favre's family through any sort of fallout. But honestly, I think 90 percent of us out there just sat back and enjoyed it.
What does that say about us, or this incident? Are we a culture in decline? Are we so obsessed with the celebrity news-driven media that we'll even pay attention to ridiculous stories like this? Have we lost our sense of dignity and respect?
While the answer to some of those questions might, in fact be yes, in this case I don't think we should judge ourselves too harshly. We care about this story for one simple reason: it's freaking hilarious.
Aside from the disturbing sexual harassment aspects of Favre's actions, the story itself is what makes this funny.
Brett Favre, 11-time Pro Bowler, three-time NFL MVP, father of two and husband of one, saw something he liked while a member of the New York Jets in 2008. That something was Jenn Sterger, a girl who parlayed internet notoriety as one of the FSU Cowgirls into a career as a model and sports personality. Sterger worked for the Jets in 2008 when Favre was there.
Apparently they spoke in passing before Favre dug up her MySpace account and sent her some odd messages. Then he got her phone number through other Jets personnel and started calling her... and leaving messages... about how much he wanted to see her at his hotel.
Eventually the relationship blossomed (on Favre's end) and the quarterback thought it would be a good idea to send Sterger multiple pictures of his little Viking.
What makes this story so funny is that Favre has been held up as the bastion of all things great in football for the past 15 years. ESPN, John Madden and the NFL have made him the example of what every player in the league should be. Tough, gritty, talented and a special person on and off the field.
So it's more than slightly amusing to find out that Favre is just as flawed, insecure and idiotic as the next guy.
If you listen to Favre's voicemails, he's clearly shocked that Sterger hasn't thrown herself at him yet. He's almost angry that she's ignored his advances. What guy hasn't gotten insecure after being rebuffed by a woman? The thing is, not many of those guys have a Super Bowl ring or hold virtually every major NFL passing record.
What gets me is Favre's mindset during this one-sided courtship.
What was he possibly thinking by sending those pictures? It had to have gone something like this: "Well Jenn you've turned me down so far, but what do you think of this!"
What was he expecting to happen? That Sterger, who had ignored his immaturity to that point, would see a picture of his hog and throw herself at him?
Then after that didn't work once, why did he send more? Dude, Brett, take a hint buddy. She doesn't like you or your digit, move on man.
The 41-year-old Favre refuses to respond to the allegations but the NFL is aggressively investigating the claims under its personal conduct policy.
Favre's family has yet to respond as well but don't be surprised if other women begin to come out of the woodwork alleging the same treatment Sterger got. Reportedly, two other Jets staff members have come forward saying they received the same treatment as Sterger.
Come on people, it's OK to laugh at this one. After the avalanche of revelations concerning Tiger Woods last year, a funny "athlete not getting sex scandal" might be just what we all need.

Brett Favre Beware: The NFL Is Thinking Pink

You may have noticed an abundance of pink on the fields of the National Football League this month. Between the pink sneakers, pink mouth guards, and pink wristbands, one would be excused for wondering how the machismo-drenched league became so fabulous overnight. Welcome to the NFL's celebration of Breast Cancer Awareness month. But there are reasons beyond the altruistic for the league's sudden concern with women's health. In September the league launched a $10 million public relations effort to woo female fans, which included the marketing of NFL jeans, sandals, and yoga mats. The 33 men that run the NFL have determined that this explosion of pink is just another way to say, "We care about our female fans: from their yoga to their tumors."

Courageous as it may be to take a stand on the polarizing issue that is breast cancer, the NFL's new efforts to woo the female fan come off as desperate and patronizing. Women go to the games for the same reason as men: to have fun and cheer themselves hoarse. But the NFL has taken on this campaign because there are those in the owner's box who fear the league has financially peaked. In a country where teams ensconced in Buffalo and Jacksonville are struggling to stay solvent, the internal expansion market has run dry. In a nation still in the grips of a Great Recession, attendance is down across the board. In a world where hatred of American football is a point of national pride, the NFL isn't going to find revenue streams overseas. In an economic climate where the well of public subsidies is parched, the need to expand the fan base has become something of mania. Enter the pink.

This concern for female sensitivities is also the reason why Minnesota Vikings quarterback Brett Farve might be in a whole world of trouble. For those living in witness protection, Favre is being investigated by the NFL for violating the league's personal conduct policy. The website deadspin.com posted voice messages and penis-pictures Favre is alleged to have sent to team employee Jenn Sterger, when both were with the New York Jets. Two Jets masseuses have since emerged with similar stories, albeit without the now ubiquitous photos of Favre's "Mississippi Burning." These photos now wallpaper the internet and yes, this is another one of those sports stories that makes us all want to bathe in bleach. Brett Favre's dong is like Lebron James: we are all witnesses.

It also puts Favre in the position of now having to scramble to defend his career, legacy, and status as an athletic icon. Love him or hate him, Favre has had without question, one of the most remarkable careers in the history of sports. In 19 NFL seasons, he has as of this writing, 290 consecutive starts, 500 touchdown passes, and 70,000 yards passing: all records. Now his consecutive start streak could be snapped along with his reputation. The sad truth is that in an era where sports scandals swirl all around us, redemption is a young person's game. If you are Michael Vick or Tiger Woods or Alex Rodriguez, and can emerge from disgrace to excel on the field, much is forgiven and forgotten. If you are Roger Clemens or Barry Bonds or Mark McGwire, the last memory becomes indelible. It doesn't matter if your crimes are misdemeanors, a felonies, or just an inability to control your libido. The field is like Lourdes and you are a SportsCenter highlight away from forgiveness.
Favre, however, is 41, missing throws he used to make in his sleep and for the first time in his long career, hearing from columnists that he should be benched. Roger Goodell, longing for that pink dollar, might agree. But if Goodell thinks that female football fans will be twirling their parasols and raising their mint juleps in gratitude for his chivalry, then the Commish clearly hasn't spent enough time in the stands of NFL games. If Goodell really wants to respect female fans, he should ban the cheerleaders, ban the sexist beer commercials, and continue to enforce equity and access for women journalists. All the rest of this is smoke and mirrors for a league flailing for dollars. Favre may have royally crossed the line but larger concerns will determine the price that he pays.